Wednesday, March 27, 2019

The Constant Gardener (sermon from Sunday, March 24, 2019)

Reading:  Luke 13:1-9

Jesus and his disciples live in a brutal world.  In this reading from the Gospel of Luke, mention is made of Pontius Pilate, the Roman governor who later condemned Jesus to death, murdering a group of Jewish worshippers as they offered sacrifices in the Temple.  And there’s also the story of another group of God’s people who were killed by a falling tower.  What do such things say about the power and the purpose of God in the world, either then or now?


A man owned a fig tree planted in his vineyard. He came looking for fruit on it and found none.  
He said to his gardener, “Look, I’ve come looking for fruit on this fig tree for three years now, 
and I’ve never found any.  Cut it down!  Why should it continue depleting the soil’s nutrients?”

If you were the gardener, how would you respond? 

Jesus and his followers are discussing the news of the day.  Sitting in a Starbucks or at Tim’s, making sense of the world around them over a cup of coffee.

“Do you remember the Temple massacre?” someone asks. 

“Oh yeah, when Pilate had that group of Galileans killed, right in the Temple when they came to Jerusalem to offer sacrifice.” 

Pilate is the Roman governor appointed and supported by Rome to keep the peace in the province of Israel.  And actually it’s not much of a surprise he had the Galileans killed.  Galileans are known to be a subversive lot, more than a little resistant to authority and ready to rebel. 

“So, I wonder, had that group gone too far?  Were they executed because they crossed a line, and become not just a nuisance but also criminal in their activity?”

“Like that other tragedy,” someone else chimes in.  “The eighteen crushed to death in Siloam – in that neighbourhood of south Jerusalem, when a tower fell on them.  I mean, why did that tower fall on them and no one else?”

“Yeah, and why did it kill them, not just injure them?  There must be a good reason.”

“Was there something especially bad about them, something horrible they were guilty of, that they suffered that way more than others around them.”


This view – that people in the world can be divided into good ones on one side, and bad ones on the other, and that one of the ways you can tell them apart is when bad things happen to those who are bad, is an ancient view.  Which means that it was held not only in old and bygone days, but that it’s born and bred deep in our bones and seems part of our ancestral DNA all through history and even today.

The world can be brutal and hard.  Bad, tragic, even terrible and horrific things happen.  Being who we are, we work hard to try to make sense of it.  And one of the ways we do that is to assume the world is made up of two kinds of people – good people and bad, and when bad things happen it must be, in most cases, because bad people are being punished for the bad things they do.  It’s a kind of logic that’s hard to escape and be free of.

It’s one of the reasons Americans, for instance, have had such a hard time with what happened on 9-11.  A friend of mine was teaching high school in a rich, Republican, fundamentalist-Christian part of San Antonio the day the towers were attacked and fell.  And the anguished question all his students asked, and that he knew he dared not try to answer, was “Why do they hate us so?  How can anyone want to do that to us?”

The reason he could not even begin to answer that question for them, was the unspoken and unquestioned assumption held by all of them that the world is made up of two kinds of people – simply good and simply bad, and that of course, they were among the good.  And how could anyone hate them that much, to do them that much evil?

Reasons and explanations were found, of course.  The pure evil of the other was part of it – always easy to argue because when we divide the world into good and bad, it’s funny how it usually matches the line between me and you, and between us and them.

And then there was also the suggestion that God allowed such evil to be done to punish America for how liberal and evil its elite had become in tolerating homosexuality, abortion and other abominations.  So it made perfect sense for people to recommit to fundamental goodness, to simple morality, and in the words of their president, to be either for or against the values, the country and the people that are good.

Unlike their other president – the fallen one, the no-longer-in-office one, the one named Clinton with a moral scandal hung around his neck, who on national television stood in the rubble of the towers and without words simply wept agonizing tears with all others who suffered there.  Also unlike so many others – that wide variety of people we have heard about in so many stories who in response to the tragedy and evil of the day without thinking about it forgot about the lines that divided them from others, and just acted spontaneously in reaching out in whatever way they could to help whoever they could.

And it’s the latter response – not the former, that seems more in line with the attitude and way of Jesus when bad things happen.  Not to try to make sense of it by dividing people into good and bad, and assuming that the point of history and the purpose of God are to reward the one and punish the other.  But to do the sensible thing of recognizing good and bad intermingled in all of us, and committing to work for the healing of us all together before we all end up losing more than we can ever imagine and ever recover from.


In 1946, after the second Great War in as many generations, an historian named Herbert Butterfield suggested a few simple things in a series of BBC radio broadcasts.  Enormous atrocity and terrible sin happen in history, he said, because of the freedom God gives us as human beings.  And when terrible things happen we should not first of all be looking to see what punishment God has somehow arranged to fall upon those who are evil.  Rather, we should be considering what good thing God is hoping to nurture in us, in response to what has been done and what has been suffered. 

The greatest judgement of heaven, Butterfield suggested, is reserved for those who imagine they can sit in judgement upon the other, and think that they are the ones who can best rule and dominate the world according to heaven’s best wishes.  And the greatest blessing of heaven is reserved for those who more simply seek to achieve some good in their little corner, do the good that’s possible right under the noses, and in whatever way is available to them with whoever is in front of them to hold to, and live out the way of Christ.


Last year when Japhia was in the hospital for a few weeks, there was one terrible night she suffered.  That day she had a new room-mate moved into the bed beside her – an elderly woman who seemed both weak and quiet.  That night, though, as this woman left her bed to go to the bathroom, she attacked Japhia and had to be restrained and returned to her bed by the nurses that came running to answer Japhia’s calls for help.

Then it happened a second time, an hour or two later.  The woman had clearly slipped into a level of dementia and aggression that no one had seen or foreseen.  She thought Japhia was her enemy meaning to do her harm, so she decided she had to get in the first blows.
In response, a soon as they could the next day the medical team – nurses, resident doctor and floor manager all came to Japhia to apologize for what had happened and to help her move to a bed they arranged for her in another room where she would be safe from further attack, and hopefully would be able to feel safe again. 

And the team also responded as best they could to the other woman’s needs.  They moved no one else into the other bed in her room, both for other people’s safety and her own peace of mind.  For two days a hospital volunteer was assigned to sit outside the door of the other woman’s room, and accompany her any time she left the room for a walk.  And that first day, even while the team was still arranging Japhia’s transfer to another room, they took the other woman for walks and invited her to join them for an hour or more at a time into the nurses’ station, where they let her use a computer to email family and friends, to read online what she wanted, maybe even play games – in part to let Japhia rest undisturbed in the room, but also to give the other woman the care that she needed. 

Because she was still their patient as well.  It was not their job to divide and choose sides, to give care to one and a cold shoulder to the other.  It was their job to reach out to, and to care for all who were there in whatever way was best and most helpful for each.


And isn’t that what and how and why a church, a community of faith, humanity informed by the spirit of Christ is called to be?  Not to be a place or a people that ignores wrong-doing and evil; that’s not what this means.  But also not a place or people where lines are drawn between good and bad people, as though we know how to do that, as though such a distinction is even possible and we can make it in any absolute sense.

But rather, to be a place and a people and a way that’s more like a hospital – a place of healing, of growth, of nurture, of redemptive and transforming care for all us together.  I like the way that Richard Rohr puts it, that “we are all mixed blessings and partly sinners, and we will always be.”  Or what Muriel Coker used to say, that there’s none of us so good there isn’t some measure of bad, and none of us so bad there isn’t some measure of good. 

And the way of Christ surely is to work for the healing of us all together in some way, before we all end up losing more than we can ever imagine and ever recover from.

No comments:

Post a Comment